Pipe formability evaluation for expandable tubulars

ABSTRACT

A method of testing a tubular member and selecting tubular members for suitability for expansion by subjecting a representative sample the tubular member to axial loading, stretching at least a portion of the tubular member through elastic deformation, plastic yield and to ultimate yield, and based upon changes in length and area calculating an expandability coefficient indicative of expandability of the tubular members and selecting tubular members with relatively high coefficients indicative of good expandability.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is the National Stage patent application for PCT patent application Ser. No. PCT/US2003/025667, filed on Aug. 18, 2003, which claimed the benefit of the filing dates of (1) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/412,653, filed on Sep. 20, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The present application is related to the following: (1) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/454,139, filed on Dec. 3, 1999, (2) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/510,913, filed on Feb. 23, 2000, (3) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/502,350, filed on Feb. 10, 2000, (4) U.S. Pat. No. 6,328,113, (5) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/523,460, filed on Mar. 10, 2000, (6) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/512,895, filed on Feb. 24, 2000, (7) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/511,941, filed on Feb. 24, 2000, (8) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/588,946, filed on Jun. 7, 2000, (9) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/559,122, filed on Apr. 26, 2000, (10) PCT patent application Ser. No. PCT/US00/18635, filed on Jul. 9, 2000, (11) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/162,671, filed on Nov. 1, 1999, (12) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/154,047, filed on Sep. 16, 1999, (13) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/159,082, filed on Oct. 12, 1999, (14) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/159,039, filed on Oct. 12, 1999, (15) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/159,033, filed on Oct. 12, 1999, (16) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/212,359, filed on Jun. 19, 2000, (17) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/165,228, filed on Nov. 12, 1999, (18) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/221,443, filed on Jul. 28, 2000, (19) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/221,645, filed on Jul. 28, 2000, (20) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/233,638, on Sep. 18, 2000, (21) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/237,334, filed on Oct. 2, 2000, (22) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/270,007, filed on Feb. 20, 2001, (23) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/262,434, filed on Jan. 17, 2001, (24) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/259,486, filed on Jan. 3, 2001, (25) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/303,740, filed on Jul. 6, 2001, (26) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/313,453, filed on Aug. 20, 2001, (27) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/317,985, filed on Sep. 6, 2001, (28) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/3318,386, filed on Sep. 10, 2001, (29) U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 09/969,922, filed on Oct. 3, 2001, (30) U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 10/016,467, filed on Dec. 10, 2001, (31) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/343,674, filed on Dec. 27, 2001, (32) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/346,309, filed on Jan. 7, 2002, (33) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/372,048, filed on Apr. 12, 2002, (34) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/380,147, filed on May 6, 2002, (35) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/387,486, filed on Jun. 10, 2002, (36) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/387,961, filed on Jun. 12, 2002, (37) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/394,703, filed on Jun. 26, 2002, (38) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/397,284, filed on Jul. 19, 2002, (39) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/398,061, filed on Jul. 24, 2002, (40) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No, 60/405,610, filed on Aug. 23, 2002, (41) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/405,394, filed on Aug. 23, 2002, (42) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/412,542, filed on Sep. 20, 2002, (43) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/412,487, filed on Sep. 20, 2002, (44) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/412,488, filed on Sep. 20, 2002, (45) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/412,177, filed on Sep. 20, 2002, (46) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/412,653, filed on Sep. 20, 2002, (47) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/412,544, filed on Sep. 20, 2002, (48) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/412,196, filed on Sep. 20, 2002, (49) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/412,187, filed on Sep. 20, 2002, and (50) U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/412,371, filed on Sep. 20, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The present application is related to each of the following: (1) U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 60/412,544, filed on Sep. 23, 2002; and (2) U.S. utility patent application Ser. No. 60/412,371, filed on Sep. 20, 2002.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to tubular steel well casing and more particularly to an expansion mandrel which reduces stress during expansion of the casing.

Solid tubular casing of substantial length is used as a borehole liner in downhole drilling. The casing is comprised of end-to-end interconnected segments of steel tubing to protect against possible collapse of the borehole and to optimize well flow. The tubing often reaches substantial depths and endures substantial pressures.

It is present practice to expand the steel tubing downhole by using a mandrel. This is a cold-working process which presents substantial mechanical challenges. This technology is known as solid expandable tubular (SET) technology. This cold-working process deforms the steel without any additional heat beyond what is present in the downhole environment.

An expansion cone, or mandrel, is used to permanently mechanically deform the pipe. The cone is moved through the tubing by a differential hydraulic pressure across the cone itself, and/or by a direct mechanical pull or push force. The differential pressure is pumped through an inner-string connected to the cone, and the mechanical force is applied by either raising or lowering the inner string.

Progress of the cone through the tubing deforms the steel beyond its elastic limit into the plastic region, while keeping stresses below ultimate yield. Expansions greater than 20%, based on pipe ID, have been accomplished. However, most applications using 4¼-13⅜ inch tubing have required expansions less than 20%. The ID of the pipe expands to the same ID of the expansion mandrel, which is a function of expansion mandrel OD. Contact between cylindrical mandrel and pipe ID during expansion leads to significant forces due to friction. It would be beneficial to provide method for testing tubular members for suitability for the expansion process. It would also be beneficial to provide a method for selecting tubing or tubular members well suited for expansion.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one aspect of the present invention, a method of testing a tubular member for suitability for expansion is provided using an expandability coefficient determined pursuant to a stress-strain test of a tubular member using axial loading.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a tubular member is selected for suitability for expansion on a basis comprising use of an expandability coefficient determined pursuant to a stress-strain test of a tubular member using axial loading.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method of testing a tubular member for suitability for expansion is provided using an expandability coefficient determined pursuant to a stress-strain test using axial loading comprising calculation of plastic strain ratio for obtaining the expansion coefficient pursuant to test results and using the formula:

$\begin{matrix} {f = \frac{\ln\frac{b_{o}}{b_{k}}}{\ln\frac{L_{k}b_{k}}{I_{o}b_{o}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1} \end{matrix}$ where, f—expandability coefficient bo & bk—initial and final tube area (inch^2) Lo & Lk—initial and final tube length (inch) b=(D^2−d^2)/4—cross section tube area.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a tubular member is selected for suitability for expansion on a basis comprising use of an expandability coefficient determined pursuant to a stress-strain test using axial loading comprising calculation of plastic strain ratio for obtaining the expansion coefficient pursuant to test results and using the formula:

$\begin{matrix} {f = \frac{\ln\frac{b_{o}}{b_{k}}}{\ln\frac{L_{k}b_{k}}{I_{o}b_{o}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1} \end{matrix}$ where, f—expandability coefficient bo & bk—initial and final tube area (inch^2) Lo & Lk—initial and final tube length (inch) b=(D^2−d^2)/4—cross section tube area.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a tubular member is selected for suitability for expansion on a basis comprising use of an expandability coefficient determined pursuant to a stress-strain test using axial loading and one or more physical properties of the tubular member selected from stress-strain properties in one or more directional orientations of the material, Charpy V-notch impact value in one or more directional orientations of the material, stress rupture burst strength, stress rupture collapse strength, strain-hardening exponent (n-value), hardness and yield strength.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for manufacturing an expandable member used to complete a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member is provided that includes forming the expandable member from a steel alloy comprising a charpy energy of at least about 90 ft-lbs.

According to another aspect of the present invention, an expandable member for use in completing a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member is provided that includes a steel alloy comprising a charpy energy of at least about 90 ft-lbs.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a structural completion positioned within a structure is provided that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members positioned within the structure; wherein one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members are fabricated from a steel alloy comprising a charpy energy of at least about 90 ft-lbs.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for manufacturing an expandable member used to complete a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member is provided that includes forming the expandable member from a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.08%.

According to another aspect of the present invention, an expandable member for use in completing a wellbore by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member at a downhole location in the wellbore is provided that includes a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.08%.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a structural completion is provided that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members positioned within the wellbore; wherein one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members are fabricated from a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.08%.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for manufacturing an expandable member used to complete a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member is provided that includes forming the expandable member from a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.20% and a charpy V-notch impact toughness of at least about 6 joules.

According to another aspect of the present invention, an expandable member for use in completing a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member is provided that includes a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.20% and a charpy V-notch impact toughness of at least about 6 joules.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a structural completion is provided that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members; wherein one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members are fabricated from a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.20% and a charpy V-notch impact toughness of at least about 6 joules.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for manufacturing an expandable member used to complete a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member is provided that includes forming the expandable member from a steel alloy comprising the following ranges of weight percentages: C, from about 0.002 to about 0.08; Si, from about 0.009 to about 0.30; Mn, from about 0.10 to about 1.92; P, from about 0.004 to about 0.07; S, from about 0.0008 to about 0.006; Al, up to about 0.04; N, up to about 0.01; Cu, up to about 0.3; Cr, up to about 0.5; Ni, up to about 18; Nb, up to about 0.12; Ti, up to about 0.6; Co, up to about 9; and Mo, up to about 5.

According to another aspect of the present invention, an expandable member for use in completing a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member is provided that includes a steel alloy comprising the following ranges of weight percentages: C, from about 0.002 to about 0.08; Si, from about 0.009 to about 0.30; Mn, from about 0.10 to about 1.92; P, from about 0.004 to about 0.07; S, from about 0.0008 to about 0.006; Al, up to about 0.04; N, up to about 0.01; Cu, up to about 0.3; Cr, up to about 0.5; Ni, up to about 18; Nb, up to about 0.12; Ti, up to about 0.6; Co, up to about 9; and Db, up to about 5.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a structural completion is provided that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members; wherein one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members are fabricated from a steel alloy comprising the following ranges of weight percentages: C, from about 0.002 to about 0.08; Si, from about 0.009 to about 0.30; Mn, from about 0.10 to about 1.92; P, from about 0.004 to about 0.07; S, from about 0.0008 to about 0.006; Al, up to about 0.04; N, up to about 0.01; Cu, up to about 0.3; Cr, up to about 0.5; Ni, up to about 18; Nb, up to about 0.12; Ti, up to about 0.6; Co, up to about 9; and Mo, up to about 5.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for manufacturing an expandable tubular member used to complete a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member is provided that includes forming the expandable tubular member with a ratio of the of an outside diameter of the expandable tubular member to a wall thickness of the expandable tubular member ranging from about 12 to 22.

According to another aspect of the present invention, an expandable member for use in completing a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member is provided that includes an expandable tubular member with a ratio of the of an outside diameter of the expandable tubular member to a wall thickness of the expandable tubular member ranging from about 12 to 22.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a structural completion is provided that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members positioned within the structure; wherein one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members are fabricated from an expandable tubular member with a ratio of the of an outside diameter of the expandable tubular member to a wall thickness of the expandable tubular member ranging from about 12 to 22.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method of constructing a structure is provided that includes radially expanding and plastically deforming an expandable member; wherein an outer portion of the wall thickness of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable member comprises tensile residual stresses.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a structural completion is provided that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members; wherein an outer portion of the wall thickness of one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members comprises tensile residual stresses.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method of constructing a structure using an expandable tubular member is provided that includes strain aging the expandable member; and then radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method for manufacturing a tubular member used to complete a wellbore by radially expanding the tubular member at a downhole location in the wellbore comprising: forming a steel alloy comprising a concentration of carbon between approximately 0.002% and 0.08% by weight of the steel alloy.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts in a schematic fragmentary cross-sectional view along a plane along and through the central axis of a tubular member that is tested to failure with axial opposed forces.

FIG. 2 is a stress-strain curve representing values for stress and strain that may be plotted for solid specimen sample.

FIG. 3. is a schematically depiction of a stress strain curve representing values from a test on a tubular member according to an illustrative example of one aspect of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

One of the problems of the pipe material selection for expandable tubular application is an apparent contradiction or inconsistency between strength and elongation. To increase burst and collapse strength, material with higher yield strength is used. The higher yield strength generally corresponds to a decrease in the fracture toughness and correspondingly limits the extent of achievable expansion.

It is desirable to select the steel material for the tubing by balancing steel strength with amount absorbed energy measure by Charpy testing. Generally these tests are done on samples cut from tubular members. It has been found to be beneficial to cut directional samples both longitudinally oriented (aligned with the axis) and circumferentially oriented (generally perpendicular to the axis). This method of selecting samples is beneficial when both directional orientations are used yet does not completely evaluate possible and characteristic anisotropy throughout a tubular member. Moreover, for small diameter tubing samples representative of the circumferential direction may be difficult and sometimes impossible to obtain because of the significant curvature of the tubing.

To further facilitate evaluation of a tubular member for suitability for expansion it has been found beneficial according to one aspect of the invention to consider the plastic strain ratio. One such ratio is called a Lankford value (or r-value) which is the ratio of the strains occurring in the width and thickness directions measured in a single tension test. The plastic strain ratio (r or Lankford-value) with a value of greater than 1.0 is found to be more resistant to thinning and better suited to tubular expansion. Such a Lankford value is found to be a measure of plastic anisotropy. The Lankford value (r) may be calculate by the Equation 2 below.

$\begin{matrix} {r = \frac{\ln\frac{b_{o}}{b_{k}}}{\ln\frac{L_{k}b_{k}}{I_{o}b_{o}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 2} \end{matrix}$ where, r—normal anisotropy coefficient bo & bk—initial and final width Lo & Lk—initial and final length

However, it is time consuming and labor intensive for this parameter to be measured using samples cut from real parts such as from the tubular members. The tubular members will have anisotropic characteristics due to crystallographic or “grain” orientation and mechanically induced differences such as impurities, inclusions, and voids, requiring multiple samples for reliably complete information. Moreover, with individual samples, only local characteristics are determined and the complete anisotropy of the tubular member may not be determinable. Further some of the tubular members have small diameters so that cutting samples oriented in a circumferential direction is not always possible. Information regarding the characteristics in the circumferential direction has been found to be important because the plastic deformation during expansion of the tubular members occurs to a very large extent in the circumferential direction,

One aspect of the present invention comprises the development of a solution for anisotropy evaluation, including a kind of plastic strain ratio similar to the Lankford parameter that is measured using real tubular members subjected to axial loading.

FIG. 1 depicts in a schematic fragmentary cross-sectional view along a plane along and through the axis 12 of a tubular member 10 that is tested with axial opposed forces 14 and 15. The tubular member 10 is axially stretched beyond the elastic limit, through yielding and to ultimate yield or fracture. Measurements of the force and the OD and ID during the process produce test data that can be used in the formula below to produce an expandability coefficient “f” as set forth in Equation 1 above. Alternatively a coefficient called a formability anisotropy coefficient F(r) that is function of the normal anisotropy Lankford coefficient r may be determined as in Equation 3 below.

$\begin{matrix} {{F(r)} = \frac{\ln\frac{b_{o}}{b_{k}}}{\ln\frac{L_{k}b_{k}}{I_{o}b_{o}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 3} \end{matrix}$ F(r)—formability anisotropy coefficient f—expandability coefficient bo & bk—initial and final tube area (inch^2) Lo & Lk—initial and final tube length (inch) b=(D^2−d^2)/4—cross section tube area.

In either circumstance f or F(r) the use of this testing method for an entire tubular member provides useful information including anisotropic characteristics or anisotropy of the tubular member for selecting or producing beneficial tubular members for down hole expansion, similar to the use of the Lankford value for a sheet material.

Just as values for stress and strain may be plotted for solid specimen samples, as schematically depicted in FIG. 2, the values for conducting a test on the tubular member may also be plotted, as depicted in FIG. 3. On this basis the expansion coefficient f (or the formability coefficient F(r)) may be determined. It will be the best to measure distribution (Tensile-elongation) in longitudinal and circumferential directions simultaneously.

The foregoing expandability coefficient (or formability coefficient) is found to be useful in predicting good expansion results and may be further useful when used in combination with one or more other properties of a tubular member selected from stress-strain properties in one or more directional orientations of the material, strength & elongation, Charpy V-notch impact value in one or more directional orientations of the material, stress burst rupture, stress collapse rupture, yield strength, ductility, toughness, and strain-hardening exponent (n-value), and hardness.

In an exemplary embodiment, a tribological system is used to reduce friction and thereby minimize the expansion forces required during the radial expansion and plastic deformation of the tubular members that includes one or more of the following: (1) a tubular tribology system; (2) a drilling mud tribology system; (3) a lubrication tribology system; and (4) an expansion device tribology system.

In an exemplary embodiment, the tubular tribology system includes the application of coatings of lubricant to the interior surface of the tubular members.

In an exemplary embodiment, the drilling mud tribology system includes the addition of lubricating additives to the drilling mud.

In an exemplary embodiment, the lubrication tribology system includes the use of lubricating greases, self-lubricating expansion devices, automated injection/delivery of lubricating greases into the interface between an expansion device and the tubular members, surfaces within the interface between the expansion device and the expandable tubular member that are self-lubricating, surfaces within the interface between the expansion device and the expandable tubular member that are textured, self-lubricating surfaces within the interface between the expansion device and the expandable tubular member that include diamond and/or ceramic inserts, thermosprayed coatings, fluoropolymer coatings, PVD films, and/or CVD films.

In an exemplary embodiment, the tubular members include one or more of the following characteristics: high burst and collapse, the ability to be radially expanded more than about40%, high fracture toughness, defect tolerance, strain recovery @ 150 F, good bending fatigue, optimal residual stresses, and corrosion resistance to H₂S in order to provide optimal characteristics during and after radial expansion and plastic deformation.

In an exemplary embodiment, the tubular members are fabricated from a steel alloy having a charpy energy of at least about 90 ft-lbs in order to provided enhanced characteristics during and after radial expansion and plastic deformation of the expandable tubular member.

In an exemplary embodiment, the tubular members are fabricated from a steel alloy having a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.08% in order to provide enhanced characteristics during and after radial expansion and plastic deformation of the tubular members.

In an exemplary embodiment, the tubular members are fabricated from a steel alloy having reduced sulfur content in order to minimize hydrogen induced cracking.

In an exemplary embodiment, the tubular members are fabricated from a steel alloy having a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.20% and a charpy-V-notch impact toughness of at least about 6 joules in order to provide enhanced characteristics during and after radial expansion and plastic deformation of the tubular members.

In an exemplary embodiment, the tubular members are fabricated from a steel alloy having a low weight percentage of carbon in order to enhance toughness, ductility, weldability, shelf energy, and hydrogen induced cracking resistance.

In several exemplary embodiments, the tubular members are fabricated from a steel alloy having the following percentage compositions in order to provide enhanced characteristics during and after radial expansion and plastic deformation of the tubular members:

C Si Mn P S Al N Cu Cr Ni Nb Ti Co Mo EXAMPLE A 0.030 0.22 1.74 0.005 0.0005 0.028 0.0037 0.30 0.26 0.15 0.095 0.014 0.0034 EXAMPLE B MIN 0.020 0.23 1.70 0.004 0.0005 0.026 0.0030 0.27 0.26 0.16 0.096 0.012 0.0021 EXAMPLE B MAX 0.032 0.26 1.92 0.009 0.0010 0.035 0.0047 0.32 0.29 0.18 0.120 0.016 0.0050 EXAMPLE C 0.028 0.24 1.77 0.007 0.0008 0.030 0.0035 0.29 0.27 0.17 0.101 0.014 0.0028 0.0020 EXAMPLE D 0.08 0.30 0.5 0.07 0.005 0.010 0.10 0.50 0.10 EXAMPLE E 0.0028 0.009 0.17 0.011 0.006 0.027 0.0029 0.029 0.014 0.035 0.007 EXAMPLE F 0.03 0.1 0.1 0.015 0.005 18.0 0.6 9 5 EXAMPLE G 0.002 0.01 0.15 0.07 0.005 0.04 0.0025 0.015 0.010

In an exemplary embodiment, the ratio of the outside diameter D of the tubular members to the wall thickness t of the tubular members range from about 12 to 22 in order to enhance the collapse strength of the radially expanded and plastically deformed tubular members.

In an exemplary embodiment, the outer portion of the wall thickness of the radially expanded and plastically deformed tubular members includes tensile residual stresses in order to enhance the collapse strength following radial expansion and plastic deformation.

In several exemplary experimental embodiments, reducing residual stresses in samples of the tubular members prior to radial expansion and plastic deformation increased the collapse strength of the radially expanded and plastically deformed tubular members.

In several exemplary experimental embodiments, the collapse strength of radially expanded and plastically deformed samples of the tubulars were determined on an as-received basis, after strain aging at 250 F for 5 hours to reduce residual stresses, and after strain aging at 350 F for 14 days to reduce residual stresses as follows:

Collapse Strength After Tubular Sample 10% Radial Expansion Tubular Sample 1 - as received from 4000 psi manufacturer Tubular Sample 1 - strain aged at 250 F. for 5 4800 psi hours to reduce residual stresses Tubular Sample 1 - strain aged at 350 F. for 14 5000 psi days to reduce residual stresses

As indicated by the above table, reducing residual stresses in the tubular members, prior to radial expansion and plastic deformation, significantly increased the resulting collapse strength—post expansion.

A method for manufacturing an expandable member used to complete a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member has been described that includes forming the expandable member from a steel alloy comprising a charpy energy of at least about 90 ft-lbs.

An expandable member for use in completing a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member has been described that includes a steel alloy comprising a charpy energy of at least about 90 ft-lbs.

A structural completion positioned within a structure has been described that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members positioned within the structure; wherein one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members are fabricated from a steel alloy comprising a charpy energy of at least about 90 ft-lbs.

A method for manufacturing an expandable member used to complete a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member has been described that includes forming the expandable member from a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.08%.

An expandable member for use in completing a wellbore by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member at a downhole location in the wellbore has been described that includes a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.08%.

A structural completion has been described that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members positioned within the wellbore; wherein one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members are fabricated from a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.08%.

A method for manufacturing an expandable member used to complete a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member has been described that includes forming the expandable member from a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.20% and a charpy V-notch impact toughness of at least about 6 joules.

An expandable member for use in completing a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member has been described that includes a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.20% and a charpy V-notch impact toughness of at least about 6 joules.

A structural completion has been described that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members; wherein one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members are fabricated from a steel alloy comprising a weight percentage of carbon of less than about 0.20% and a charpy V-notch impact toughness of at least about 6 joules.

A method for manufacturing an expandable member used to complete a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member has been described that includes forming the expandable member from a steel alloy comprising the following ranges of weight percentages: C, from about 0.002 to about 0.08; Si, from about 0.009 to about 0.30; Mn, from about 0.10 to about 1.92; P, from about 0.004 to about 0.07; S, from about 0.0008 to about 0.006; Al, up to about 0.04; N, up to about 0.01; Cu, up to about 0.3; Cr, up to about 0.5; Ni, up to about 18; Nb, up to about 0.12; Ti, up to about 0.6; Co, up to about 9; and Mo, up to about 5.

An expandable member for use in completing a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member has been described that includes a steel alloy comprising the following ranges of weight percentages: C, from about 0.002 to about 0.08; Si, from about 0.009 to about 0.30; Mn, from about 0.10 to about 1.92; P, from about 0.004 to about 0.07; S, from about 0.0008 to about 0.006; Al, up to about 0.04; N, up to about 0.01; Cu, up to about 0.3; Cr, up to about 0.5; Ni, up to about 18; Nb, up to about 0.12; Ti, up to about 0.6; Co, up to about 9; and Mo, up to about 5.

A structural completion has been described that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members; wherein one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members are fabricated from a steel alloy comprising the following ranges of weight percentages: C, from about 0.002 to about 0.08; Si, from about 0.009 to about 0.30; Mn, from about 0.10 to about 1.92; P, from about 0.004 to about 0.07; S, from about 0.0008 to about 0.006; Al, up to about 0.04; N, up to about 0.01; Cu, up to about 0.3; Cr, up to about 0.5; Ni, up to about 18; Nb, up to about 0.12; Ti, up to about 0.6; Co, up to about 9; and Mo, up to about 5.

A method for manufacturing an expandable tubular member used to complete a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member has been described that includes forming the expandable tubular member with a ratio of the of an outside diameter of the expandable tubular member to a wall thickness of the expandable tubular member ranging from about 12 to 22.

An expandable member for use in completing a structure by radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member has been described that includes an expandable tubular member with a ratio of the of an outside diameter of the expandable tubular member to a wall thickness of the expandable tubular member ranging from about 12 to 22.

A structural completion has been described that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members positioned within the structure; wherein one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members are fabricated from an expandable tubular member with a ratio of the of an outside diameter of the expandable tubular member to a wall thickness of the expandable tubular member ranging from about 12 to 22.

A method of constructing a structure has been described that includes radially expanding and plastically deforming an expandable member; wherein an outer portion of the wall thickness of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable member comprises tensile residual stresses.

A structural completion has been described that includes one or more radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members; wherein an outer portion of the wall thickness of one or more of the radially expanded and plastically deformed expandable members comprises tensile residual stresses.

A method of constructing a structure using an expandable tubular member has been described that includes strain aging the expandable member; and then radially expanding and plastically deforming the expandable member.

A method for manufacturing a tubular member used to complete a wellbore by radially expanding the tubular member at a downhole location in the wellbore has been described that includes forming a steel alloy comprising a concentration of carbon between approximately 0.002% and 0.08% by weight of the steel alloy.

It is understood that variations may be made to the foregoing without departing from the spirit of the invention. For example, the teachings of the present disclosure may be used to form and/or repair a wellbore casing, a pipeline, or a structural support. Furthermore, the various teachings of the present disclosure may combined, in whole or in part, with various of the teachings of the present disclosure.

Although illustrative embodiments of the invention have been shown and described, a wide range of modification, changes and substitution is contemplated in the foregoing disclosure. In some instances, some features of the present invention may be employed without a corresponding use of the other features. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly and in a manner consistent with the scope of the invention. 

1. A method for selecting a solid steel tubular member for suitability for downhole radial expansion and plastic deformation to form a steel wellbore casing on a basis comprising use of an expandability coefficient determined pursuant to a change in diameter of the solid steel tubular member resulting from a stress-strain test performed on the solid steel tubular member, while in a tubular shape, using tensile axial loading.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the solid steel tubular member including the percentage by weight of carbon being no less that 0.02% and less than 0.030%.
 3. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the solid steel tubular member including stress-strain properties in one or more directional orientations.
 4. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the strength and elongation of the solid steel tubular member.
 5. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the stress burst rupture of the solid steel tubular member.
 6. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the strain-hardening exponent and hardness of the solid steel tubular member.
 7. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the solid steel tubular member including a Charpy V-notch impact value in one or more directional orientations.
 8. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the stress collapse rupture of the solid steel tubular member.
 9. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the yield strength of the solid steel tubular member.
 10. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the ductility of the solid steel tubular member.
 11. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the toughness of the solid steel tubular member.
 12. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the solid steel tubular member including a Charpy energy of at least 90 ft-lbs.
 13. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on each of the following ranges of weight percentages of the solid steel tubular member: Si being from 0.009% to 0.30%; Mn being from 0.10% to 1.92%; P being from 0.004% to 0.07%; S being from 0.0008% to 0.006%; Al being up to 0.04%; N being up to 0.01%; Cu being up to 0.3%; Cr being up to 0.5%; Ni being up to 18%; Nb being up to 0.12%; Ti being up to 0.6%; Co being up to 9%; and Mo being up to 5%.
 14. The method of claim 1 wherein the expandability coefficient includes a plastic strain ratio of the steel tubular member.
 15. The method of claim 14 wherein the plastic strain ratio includes measurements in multiple anisotropic directions.
 16. The method of claim 14 wherein the plastic strain ratio includes a ratio of the strains occurring in the width and length directions of the steel tubular member.
 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the expandability coefficient includes a plastic anisotropy of the steel tubular member.
 18. The method of claim 1 wherein the expandability coefficient includes a formability anisotropy coefficient F(r).
 19. A method comprising: providing a solid steel tubular member; performing a stress-strain test on the solid steel tubular member using tensile axial loading while the solid steel tubular member is in a tubular shape, causing a change in diameter of the solid steel tubular member; determining an expandability coefficient of the solid steel tubular member based on the change in diameter from the stress-strain test; selecting another solid steel tubular member using the expandability coefficient; disposing the selected solid steel tubular member in an earthen wellbore; and radially expanding and plastically deforming the selected solid steel tubular member to form a steel wellbore casing.
 20. The method of claim 19 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the solid steel tubular member including the percentage by weight of carbon being no less that 0.02% and less than 0.030%.
 21. The method of claim 19 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the solid steel tubular member including stress-strain properties in one or more directional orientations.
 22. The method of claim 19 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the strength and elongation of the solid steel tubular member.
 23. The method of claim 19 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the stress burst rupture of the solid steel tubular member.
 24. The method of claim 19 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the strain-hardening exponent and hardness of the solid steel tubular member.
 25. The method of claim 19 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the solid steel tubular member including a Charpy V-notch impact value in multiple directional orientations.
 26. The method of claim 19 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on each of the following ranges of weight percentages of the solid steel tubular member: Si being from 0.009% to 0.30%; Mn being from 0.10% to 1.92%; P being from 0.004% to 0.07%; S being from 0.0008% to 0.006%; Al being up to 0.04%; N being up to 0.01%; Cu being up to 0.3%; Cr being up to 0.5%; Ni being up to 18%; Nb being up to 0.12%; Ti being up to 0.6%; Co being up to 9%; and Mo being up to 5%.
 27. The method of claim 19 wherein the expandability coefficient includes a plastic strain ratio of the steel tubular member.
 28. The method of claim 19 wherein the expandability coefficient includes a plastic anisotropy of the steel tubular member.
 29. The method of claim 19 wherein the expandability coefficient includes a formability anisotropy coefficient F(r).
 30. A method comprising: providing a solid steel tubular member; performing a stress-strain test on the solid steel tubular member using tensile axial loading while the solid steel tubular member is in a tubular shape; collecting data as a result of the stress-strain test, the data including an outer diameter of the steel tubular member and an inner diameter of the steel tubular member; determining an expandability coefficient of the solid steel tubular member using the data; selecting another solid steel tubular member using the expandability coefficient; disposing the selected solid steel tubular member in an earthen wellbore; displacing an expansion device through the selected solid steel tubular member while in the wellbore to radially expand and plastically deform the selected solid steel tubular member.
 31. The method of claim 30 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the solid steel tubular member including the percentage by weight of carbon being no less that 0.02% and less than 0.030%.
 32. The method of claim 30 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is (Previously presented) further based on the solid steel tubular member including stress-strain properties in one or more directional orientations.
 33. The method of claim 30 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the strength and elongation of the solid steel tubular member.
 34. The method of claim 30 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the stress burst rupture of the solid steel tubular member.
 35. The method of claim 30 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the strain-hardening exponent and hardness of the solid steel tubular member.
 36. The method of claim 30 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on the solid steel tubular member including a Charpy V-notch impact value in multiple directional orientations.
 37. The method of claim 30 wherein selecting the solid steel tubular member is further based on each of the following ranges of weight percentages of the solid steel tubular member: Si being from 0.009% to 0.30%; Mn being from 0.10% to 1.92%; P being from 0.004% to 0.07%; S being from 0.0008% to 0.006%; Al being up to 0.04%; N being up to 0.01%; Cu being up to 0.3%; Cr being up to 0.5%; Ni being up to 18%; Nb being up to 0.12%; Ti being up to 0.6%; Co being up to 9%; and Mo being up to 5%.
 38. The method of claim 30 wherein the expandability coefficient includes a plastic strain ratio of the steel tubular member.
 39. The method of claim 30 wherein the expandability coefficient includes a plastic anisotropy of the steel tubular member.
 40. The method of claim 30 wherein the expandability coefficient includes a formability anisotropy coefficient F(r).
 41. The method of claim 30 wherein the data includes the strains occurring in the width and length directions of the steel tubular member, and the determining an expandability coefficient includes a ratio of the strains.
 42. A method for selecting a solid steel tubular member for suitability for downhole radial expansion and plastic deformation to form a steel wellbore casing on a basis comprising use of an expandability coefficient determined pursuant to a stress-strain test performed on the solid steel tubular member, while in a tubular shape, using tensile axial loading, wherein the expandability coefficient is calculated using the formula: $\begin{matrix} {f = \frac{\ln\frac{b_{o}}{b_{k}}}{\ln\frac{L_{k}b_{k}}{I_{o}b_{o}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1} \end{matrix}$ where, f—expandability coefficient; b_(o) & b_(k)—initial and final tube cross sectional area (inch^2); L_(o) & L_(k)—initial and final tube length (inch); b=(D^2−d^2)/4—cross section tube area; D=tube outside diameter; and d=tube inside diameter.
 43. A method comprising: providing a solid steel tubular member; performing a stress-strain test on the solid steel tubular member using tensile axial loading while the solid steel tubular member is in a tubular shape; determining an expandability coefficient of the solid steel tubular member based on the stress-strain test; selecting another solid steel tubular member using the expandability coefficient; disposing the selected solid steel tubular member in an earthen wellbore; and radially expanding and plastically deforming the selected solid steel tubular member to form a steel wellbore casing; wherein the expandability coefficient is calculated using the formula: $\begin{matrix} {f = \frac{\ln\frac{b_{o}}{b_{k}}}{\ln\frac{L_{k}b_{k}}{I_{o}b_{o}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1} \end{matrix}$ where, f—expandability coefficient; b_(o) & b_(k)—initial and final tube cross sectional area (inch^2); L_(o) & L_(k)—initial and final tube length (inch); b=(D^2−d^2)/4—cross section tube area; D=tube outside diameter; and d=tube inside diameter.
 44. A method comprising: providing a solid steel tubular member; performing a stress-strain test on the solid steel tubular member using tensile axial loading while the solid steel tubular member is in a tubular shape; collecting data as a result of the stress-strain test; determining an expandability coefficient of the solid steel tubular member using the data; selecting another solid steel tubular member using the expandability coefficient; disposing the selected solid steel tubular member in an earthen wellbore; displacing an expansion device through the selected solid steel tubular member while in the wellbore to radially expand and plastically deform the selected solid steel tubular member; wherein the expandability coefficient is calculated using the formula: $\begin{matrix} {f = \frac{\ln\frac{b_{o}}{b_{k}}}{\ln\frac{L_{k}b_{k}}{I_{o}b_{o}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1} \end{matrix}$ where, f—expandability coefficient; b_(o) & b_(k)—initial and final tube cross sectional area (inch^2); L_(o) & L_(k)—initial and final tube length (inch); b=(D^2−d^2)/4—cross section tube area; D=tube outside diameter; and d=tube inside diameter.
 45. A method comprising: providing a solid steel tubular member; performing a stress-strain test on the solid steel tubular member using tensile axial loading while the solid steel tubular member is in a tubular shape; collecting data as a result of the stress-strain test; determining an expandability coefficient of the solid steel tubular member using the data; selecting another solid steel tubular member using the expandability coefficient; disposing the selected solid steel tubular member in an earthen wellbore; displacing an expansion device through the selected solid steel tubular member while in the wellbore to radially expand and plastically deform the selected solid steel tubular member; wherein the data includes a force measurement, an outer diameter of the steel tubular member, an inner diameter of the steel tubular member, or a combination thereof, and the determining an expandability coefficient includes calculating an anisotropy of the steel tubular member using a ratio of the data. 